canon 135mm f2 astrophotographyprotest behavior avoidant attachment
Oh yes, and it leads to lusting after other primes! I own Samyang 135 f2 for Nikon Mount and indeed it is incredible value lens. Jordan has a simple fix camera manufacturers could implement to improve their video autofocus. What's it got and what's it like to use? A quick question, I have a Sony a6300 mirrorless camera which is great but the sensor is very close behind the mount. With no general agreement about what Bokeh is it is little wonder that there is so much argument and disagreement. Tamron has announced its 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD ultra-wide angle zoom will be made available for Fujifilm X-mount. Try to have eyes and nose / lips all in focus. If this was used to shoot video you would think that the first image was using a green screen. (on a full frame camera)Wonderful lens for some portraiture applications, sporting events and candids at a party or event. Love the shot of the blue anemone, which also displays nice bokeh, and blur! As the reader reviews below testify, this is an absolutely stellar lens, probably one of the sharpest and most distortion-free that Canon makes. Not heavy like the white tele-zooms. it is crisp, fast, and awsome. the lens is built strong, very strong. Because of chromatic aberration, no telephoto lens can be used at full aperture. If you have the 1.8 version, way to go. This allows for less aggressive camera settings for night photography such as using a lower ISO setting and shorter exposure. So I sold it for nearly what I bought it for and chalked it up to a learning experience. The article was based on the numerous lenses with which I have personal experience - that is naturally limited. Far from being a generic run-of-the-mill image hosting website, it was created and is still operated by an astrophotographer, and boasts features that are very specific to astrophotography. The only downside with that lens is that it is manual focus, which might not be suitable for photographing sports or children. Besides lack of IS, the only major issue I have with this lens is flare. Best lens for portraiture I've ever tried. A lot of lenses today are better than anything money could buy in 1980. #light_bulb I would disagree. You may need to stop down to control star bloat, and thats exactly what Ive done with this 135. It improves slightly stopped down. Simple as that! F2 allows higher shutter speeds in lower light without raising the ISO. It would not surprise me if modern lenses were useable at full aperture. Do I wish it were manufactured with metal? While they provide a very large flat field we noticed some CA. The model I use feels solid and the barrel is constructed with metal. This new, affordable wide zoom for L-mount is capable of some excellent landscapes. When all that was available were APS-C crop cameras a 85mm lens provided a near equivalent view angle to the 135mm on a full frame camera. It disagrees completely with the definition that you give! I should mention that I have only tested this full-frame lens using my astrophotography DSLRs, all of which are crop-sensor camera bodies. In this post, Ill share my results using an affordable prime telephoto lens for astrophotography, the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC. There is no such thing, in my opinion. http://www.idyll.com/135. - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I have recently received my star adventurer and as of now only have the star adventurer, benro tripod (super stable), and a unmodded canon t2i with only a 18-55mm lens. For that I would investigate alternatives just to make sure. This lens flares easily and the flare can be especially ugly if a sun or flash are in the frame. Before I go any further, Id like to share a photo from Gabriel Millou of the Andromeda Galaxy using a Canon 1300D. Have not used a 70-200 since. Just plain black plastic (no interior felt as in newer lens hoods). Stuff I used to take the photos in this video:- The Canon 135mm f2 lens: https://amzn.to/346Paz7- Sony A7III Camera: https://amzn.to/2xM776q- Sony Grip exten. DPReview March Madness, round one - vote! I speak Japanese fluently, was a translator in Tokyo for 8 years and studied photography there for two years. I actually have to walk 1/2 way up the stairs to be able get folk in the frame. My questions, for deep sky pics, should I get the 135mm lens or the RedCat 51 APO 250mm f/4.9 which you mentioned here as well? Great looking lens, if you ever saw it from the front. Got it! I have the Canon EF 135mm, f2L USM. Rudy, why didn t you include any L lenses from canon? (purchased for $1,000), reviewed January 1st, 2007 If you are a Nikon user, of course have a look at the Nikon AF Nikkor 135mm f/2D DC and compare it to the other lenses mentioned in this article. The sigma 150mm f2.8 tests very well, zeiss 135mm apo sonnar, and leica 180mm f3.5 apo all proven performers on star tests. Also, when shooting the heart nebula, is the sky tracker a must or not required? Seems to me that with your gallery and website of images you should refrain from passing judgment on who is and isn't a photography master. To shoot indoors under typical gymnasium lighting, you often need f/2.0 or wider to get a shutter speed high enough to stop the action. I also find the other photos not very good. You will see why. Also, we ought never question or diminish the joy of others. With a good smartphone, some creative legwork, and the photos scaled down as they are in this article you can make photos that at least just as good. Were those taken with the Canon telephotos you spoke of, and the full spectrum modified camera and the clip in filter? My Rokinon 135F2 on my crop body is fun to play with.. a budget lens with budget construction on a discontinued camera system.. but hey im just a ham and egger https://flic.kr/p/21nj82V, I had a Canon 135/2 for a while, but I decided I preferred the 100 L used not as a Macro but a normal lens (which my non-L USM 100 Macro was quite poor for). The 135mm f2.8 in particular can take amazing photos of the brighter deep sky objects with about 1 second time . Super sharp and renders beautiful creamy bokeh. Thanks for the fine article and the thought you put into it. Bond, I expect you to buy! When the aperture is stopped down to 37mm using step-down filter rings, this lens produces incredibly tiny pinpoint star images from edge to edge. Weight. Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8. Comment * document.getElementById("comment").setAttribute( "id", "a0721c0ca7d0974fd27b5d0ceb81918a" );document.getElementById("cfd2c22fe2").setAttribute( "id", "comment" ); Your email address will not be published. That's why I really enjoy shooting portraits with it. Why so salty? I liked the extra versatility of the zoom and the ability to shoot at 200mm. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.No disagreement here. A series of such images can be digitally stacked to produce excellent results. Online since 2011, AstroBin is the #1 complete solution for image hosting of astrophotographs. Some people like these, and consider them decorative. (purchased for $725), reviewed March 26th, 2013 Unfortunately, standard photography lenses are generally poorly corrected for CA at the red end of the spectrum, relying on the human eye's poorer resolution in red than green or blue. Your images have a chance at remaining sharper once critical focus has been achieved, but now you have lost the extra light-gathering power you wanted. When you shoot a 135mm F2 lens at F2, your subject will stand out in this beautiful way, often without much work needed from you as the photographer. I had a 70-200 f/4 that i used unstopped at 200 with awesome results. The extent of this influence lies mainly in photographer's perception and creativity.As all arts photography may serve given needs due to numerous reasons with the resulting integrity of the work not necessarily suggesting art.The photographic gear (from lens cleaning tissues up to s/w) is just the tool(s) of a photographer in order to produce its work. And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. It has just a hint of chromatic aberration on very bright stars and, if highly enlarged by 400-800%, the stars in the very corners barely begin to show a touch of astigmatism. Would you recommend a collar/support for the lens? Still, all things considered, I prize this lens very highly and can not imagine giving it up. It's sharp, has very low aberrations, no real distortion and the bokeh is very nice. Best lenses for astrophotography: 50, 85 and 135mm - DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging - Cloudy Nights Cloudy Nights Astrophotography and Sketching DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. I would recommend buying it used if you want to save some money, with the added benefit that you can re-sell it at the same price as you bought it for, effectively giving you the opportunity to "rent it" for free. Thanks.. or.. Clear Skies! Of course headline central sharpness is great, that is what grabs headlines, always shot at f2: any 135mm lens is going to give similar results. If you can tolerate vignetting, there are many normal 35mm lenses that are great wide open. I would like to make this work with the Nikkor 180mm ED (i.e., what I have versus what I cannot havelol). The APO showed no chromatic aberration at all with the addition of the Astronomik UV/IR cut clip filter (passing 380-680nm), but the telephoto lenses, even when stopped down, showed a tight bright red ring around all stars. Definetely the most sharpest lens which I have ever seen. Stage photography is another good use for the 135 L. Zoom lenses are entirely unsuitable for astrophotography due to prominent aberrations of every kind. He loves photography, and runs a YouTube channel with tutorials, lens reviews and photography inspiration. For some reason Samyang makes lenses nobody is asking for. (And cost less too). It is harder work than using a zoom lens, and some shots I just cannot get at all (cannot get close enough, or far enough way) but the shots I do get are so much nicer looking than I get with any other lens that for me and my goals it is a fair trade off. Great lens, but I can't understand why Canon can't control quality. When you buy a lens with fantastic sharpness and image quality at all apertures, you typically expect it to cost $1,200 on up. I also tested 200 f/2.8 tele and it is one of the most perfect lens in existence, as well as the 135. Perfect lens on the same level as CZ! So, for Joe User or especially for Jane Client, one really has to look closely to see much of a difference. The Rokinon 135mm F2.0 is considered to be a full-frame lens because it can accommodate a full-frame image sensor with its 18.8-degree angle of view. One very popular lens for bokeh fiends is the Canon 85mm F1.2it can produce extremely creamy out of focus backgrounds. At 135mm, you can get really creative about the object or objects you shoot and where you position them within the frame. I shoot it wide open 90% of the time. This article was originally published on Micael's blog, and is being republished in full with express permission. I need fast auto-focus, predictable focus lock and natural, vibrant color rendition. (Actually if I can live with the DoF I prefer it to my 85/1.2 too, as there is much less bonus colour.) On the 135/2 all you've got is the bare metal. Everyone should have one? Stellarium has a great viewport feature that allows you to preview different lens and sensor combinations on DSO's before you decide on the focal length you want. This lens is one of canons finest lenses i have ever used. The lenses I listed are certainly not the ONLY exceptional lenses made over the years. The diameter of the lens is 77mm, with a non-rotating filter mount on the objective lens. For some objects a reflection can take away from the photo because it covers interesting details of the object (Think Alnitak in the Horsehead Nebula). I bought my lens in mint condition for $350 from Japan, but I see that some retailers are asking significantly more. As it is it is earns a 9. There are a total of 8 stops actually written on the lens. Literally it means "blur" so you could just as well use the dictionary definition below the top match from Google search: Bokeh - the visual quality of the out-of-focus areas of a photographic image, especially as rendered by a particular lens. It is so sharp it makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. Otherwise I might not achieve focus? The Canon 135mm f/2 is no less impressive on a full-frame camera. They seem to be really good for NB work. I've tested some of the old Pentax 6x7 lenses with a friend. As such, it applies most directly here to areas of an image that are out of focus. Or just get a zoom that is 24-200mm and you are covered. So there - it is not a perfect object. I want to see the bokeh and the sharpness at 100% mag, don't care about the photos. I think youll find that this lens is behind some of the most amazing wide-field astrophotography images online! No telephoto lens, and no apochromat, is sufficiently corrected to accomodate such a wide spectral range. I took a few shots with the lens on my way home after buying it. I have the Sony SaL 135F1.8 Zeiss Lens and think that is excellent. As a complete beginner in Astrophotography should I buy Rokinon 135mm lens or Canon EF 75-300mm lens with Canon EF 50mm lens? Sharp without being harsh. Test Notes Sharp but smooth at the same time. Also, the lens can only be operated when aperture is set to 22, wondering how I could use F2. A camera tracker (or star tracker) is necessary for long exposure deep-sky astrophotography, but a compact model such as the iOptron SkyTracker or Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer will do just fine. The few occasions I use a 135 FL usually are landscape shots (where I have no use for f2) and childrens playing (where I need zoom and fast af). Images that sing. Several functions may not work. This makes me feel I shall take the Zeiss 85F1.8 off my A6000 or maybe NOT, it's just another hype article about "A" lens. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC. I'll take photo of Orion as soon as possible. Finally, although we don't explicitly test for it, we have to note that this lens' bokeh (rendering of out-of-focus objects) is really excellent as well. If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. If you're using or are looking to buy the Samyang or Rokinon 135mm F/2, please let me know what you're imaging with it or any questions you may have in the comment section below. Now we have to read this kind of ignorant misinformation on DPR articles. Writer Anno Huidekoper takes a look at what this manual SLR can do and how it stacks up to its contemporaries. If you want the best value possible for your money, and can survive without autofocus, buy the Samyang. The only reason i sell this lens is because of versatility. In fact, a light-weight 200/2.8 seems more interesting to own (e.g., the Minolta 200/2.8). +1 for the 135mm lens. So.. its like there is one F stop not being used by the lens..how do you know what click is for what F stop?? Over the last ten to fifteen years excellent apochromatic telescopes have become available for visual use and photography. We think it rises to the challenge. I recommend the author change the title of his article from "The Best Telephoto Lenses." to "Some Inexpensive Telephoto Lenses I Have Tested" The original title generates a claim and expectation in the reader that his article can't support that leads to reader frustration and just more questions; why didn't you test this one or do this etc. http://www.astrovale-f-2/index.html, Hi Lord_Vader, (For Nikon users there's the new 105mm too.). Hate these presumptuous kinds of articles and headlines. The F/2.0 maximum aperture of the Rokinon 135mm lens offers a chance to collect a serious amount of signal in a single shot. This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop . Sme of the wide field are. You might never need another lens in the overlapping range at 135mm there isn't much difference between the separation afforded by f/2 vs f/2.8, and the latest 70-200s are plenty sharp. Chromatic aberration is almost eliminated in narrowband, so lenses with that problem may be fine performers. The Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens makes an excellent indoor sports lens. I hear great things about the Canon 200/2.8 L but do not have one. One difference worth pointing out is for those who image using narrowband filters. Looking forward to allow purchasing the Canon 200mm f/2.8L II USM. "Bokeru" is a verb, and it can apply equally to to optical and psychological effects, including the reduced mental clarity that can some with age. modest cost for "L" series, wonderful optics and fast speed, nitpicking, but not a circular aperature and no weather sealing. Canon 135mm is a great lens. There is no doubt that the 135L deserves it excellent reputation for image quality. Contrasty but not harsh. Build quality: excellent. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens for Canon EF Mount from Rokinon is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and all medium telephoto applications. Overall, spectacular lens. I am not really looking at buying anything else, though. I just love the lightning fast & accurate focus of this lens. To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. Explore the sky, try frame some targets and see what works well with your DSLR and lens combination. With an effective focal length of roughly 216mm when coupled with a Canon crop sensor body, the field of view is nearly identical to the one youd find on a full-frame camera with a 200mm telephoto lens. The screws should be set sufficiently tightly to prevent shift, yet not so tightly as to interfere with fine focusing. The image below was captured using a DSLR and 135mm lens on the Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer mount. Although this lens feels solid, it is rather light when compared to a telescope. As you'd expect from a premium prime lens, both maximum and average chromatic aberration is very low across the aperture range, with the maximum CA on the order of 0.02% of frame height regardless of aperture. It is worth of it's price?Any links to astrophotos with this lens?Thanks. (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix) ". In photoshop I love to zoom 200, 300 and even 400% to see the extreme details it is an absolutely amazing lens, great backround blur, great for low light weddings with available light. I thought I had to sell my 100/F2.8 macro L but thanks for letting me know I can keep it. I would be careful with the Nikon 135 f/2 DC (I have one). The OP admits he limited experience with lenses other than what he has. Built quality is wonderful, focus ring is well-damped. And now important part: This lens can be stopped down if desired effect is not required and no, with 85/1.8 you will never get this effect. Did anybody use this lens for DSLR astrophoto? Both the 135 and 200mm Canon l lenses are winners IMHO. You can also find him as @mwroll on Instagram and 500px. The background blur is amazingly creamy with this lens. You will get perfectly round star images if you use an aperture stop in front of the lens made of a series of filter thread step-down rings. We were surprised by just how much difference there was between these AI-powered image enlargers. don't get me wrong; this lens will take great photos, but the 'flatness' i was getting in my photos nearly had me give up 25 years of hobby photography. With the 135 I imagine I'd have to get up on the roof. This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. Also Nikon DC 135mm f/2 is a great lens, a little better than 135mm Canon Today I want to talk about another such lens design: The 135mm F2 lens. tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej BTW, the 300-mm Tele-Tessar you describe -- what camera was it made for? Well, if you consider downloading a lens image from https://www.bhphotovideo.com, and photoshop it on top of my photos to cover mistakes, and demonstrate sharpness of a lens with a jpeg that is way oversharpened; if you call knowledge that "the long focal length compresses the background" , If you call blurr a bokeh just because it sounds better, and so on 1000 words would not be enough to point out what a mess this review is Then you are right, I absolutely do not know as much as he does. The one and only 300mm lens I tested is the Zeiss Tele-Tessar 300mm F4. imca stock car chassis builders, lee and tiffany lakosky farm location, master list of dead scientists and microbiologists,
Reynoldsburg High School Teachers,
Country Music Awards 2023,
Articles C